Quote:
Originally Posted by PBucksJohn
The fact that people on this board are sitting here defending pictures that are obviously meant to portray children having sex is simply astounding.
It isn't drawing a line or comparing it to people who want all porn banned. It is child porn. I don't think there is much else to say here  |
i think the problem is some people don't agree that the pictures are " obviously meant to portray children". Most of the girls look over 18 to be honest , there are def some questionable ones but even those ones i would find it hard to charge they were intentionally making them look underage.
I'm pretty sure in canada some of those might be considered illegal , but it's hard to say , it all has to do with if whomever is judging the pictures figures it is simulated cp
I started a thread the other day about westboro baptist church the other day and the fact directnic is their registrar , basically asking what people thought about it. Most people generally agreed it is up to the courts to enforce laws not registrars, and were talking REAL victims here not simulated drawings. I would think most people would generally feel the same way about processing.