Originally Posted by bringer

nothing to do with sex but is considered adult? nothing to do with sex but they're nude? you can say that REAL BDSM gives no sexual satisfaction to the subject but the person paying to see it sure is getting satisfaction. are you saying of max had tied up these "underage" girls and whipped them it would be ok? btw, even if the line you set was followed, wouldnt it still be considered "rape" by a jury if someone is restrained and forces to "please" their master? whether its licking a boot or sucking a cock, if they get off on it whats the difference? it would be RAPE if you actually forced someone to act that out in real life so how is it any different using actors in a studio?