View Single Post
Old 06-08-2008, 04:02 PM  
IllTestYourGirls
Ah My Balls
 
IllTestYourGirls's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421
Posts: 14,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBucksJohn View Post
I'm on my way out the door so this will have to be short. The comparisons to ancient sculpture/art are completely off. There is a major difference between the sculpture posted above and scenes of penetration, sexual dialog, etc. Show me some art in the Vatican portraying underage people and cumshots and I will say that Yes, that is a problem also. I doubt you'll find it tho. It is a stupid comparison to make.

Intent and purpose have a lot of influence on what something is. Your greek sculpture wasn't created and intended for someone to fulfill the fantasy of having sex with a child.

I wanted to see a link to the supreme court decision as the interpretation of things is often times not the reality of what they are. Lots of speech is protected, as it should be, that doesn't mean there aren't exceptions.

Glad to hear the UK has its head on straight.

It isn't going to be the tube sites, government meddling, visa rules, or xsales that will cause this industry long term problems. It will be the total lack of any type of internal policing and the ridiculously low barrier of entry that allows people to jump right in and do things such as this which give us all a bad name.

I have to run, but will be back in a few hours.
You are right greek sculpture was not created to fulfill the fantasy it was created because it was happening in real life. (I am not trying to defend this) Maybe the example in the OP should be banned (I think it should), its just leading down a very slippery path.

Man touching boy:


beast fucking girl


questionable couple fucking
__________________
IllTestYourGirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote