Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienQ
Paying bums to fight each other for media profit and distribution was found as a crime and Many of Max Hardcore titles fall in the same line. Standing up for scum bags like Max Hardcore that hide behind the "Freedom Of Speech" is nothing more than a diabolical perversion to justify making buck off of underpaid desperate models, coke whores and whores exploiting them and distributing the work for a buck.
That is not freedom of speech it is exploitation and the sales of criminal sexual activity bottom line.
|
scary. if we replaced "Max Hardcore" with "all porn", that paragraph could of been taken from the family research council's websites. they believe that ALL porn models are victims of poverty being exploited by those looking to make a quick buck. are all women in porn victims? or just the ones in the movies you consider obscene? you think all the women in the movies you jack to love getting a load shot on their face? or do they do it for a pay check? how about bdsm? tied up and whipped, dominated. are they being victimized? whipping a nude tied up women is illegal, so is portraying that fantasy in a controlled environment with consenting adults obscene? or will YOU ALLOW that one to continue? you might disagree with max's content, but in the end YOUR line and the line of those who are prosecuting max are on opposite sides of the spectrum making them dangerous. they want all porn gone, end of story. ps, will you be crying here in a few years if anal, dp, twink, facials, bdsm or any other "mainstream" niche is attacked next? what do you push? just keys on a forum?