|
"obscene" isn't an obscure "notion" - the Miller Test and case law give you a pretty clear idea of what criteria something must meet to be obscene.. furthermore, the supreme court has ruled that each community has the right to decide for themselves what "obscene" is..
imagine that!!!
democracy in action.
the judges in their wisdom understood that since every community is different and has different values, they should have the right to decide for themselves what is obscene.
crazy notion.
sounds a lot like freedom to me.
interesting that you guys want to ramble on about "freedom" and can't respect that of others.
its not like people are getting arrested for sticking their penis in another consenting adult here. we are talking about some very very very extreme shit and the inevitable end to a torrid story about someone that even pornographers think is ridiculous and over the line.
you have yet to explain why this "notion" of "obscenity" is unconstitutional. i have never said it can't be.
i am not defending anything. i am simply picking on a bunch of jackasses that line up behind the worst of the worst... people that will destroy your livelihood and defend them as they invite the federal government and prosecutions into your life and scream "fuck the world" as they do it, on your behalf with you forcing yourself into the position of taking his side.
FYI, "i don't like this" doesn't equate to "its totally unconstitutional"
|