View Single Post
Old 06-07-2008, 02:39 PM  
Jenny S.
Confirmed User
 
Jenny S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Europe and SE US
Posts: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adult Lounge - Brad View Post
Did anyone attend the trial? Was Max not able to get the performers in to testify that everything was consensual and all acting?
Whether it was consensual or nor wasn't an issue, obscenity was, and the Feds chose a location for the trial where the material most likely would be viewed as "obscene". That's called "jury shopping". It HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH OBSCENE, it has something to do WHAT SOMEBODY IN BUM FUCK IDAHO or wherever CONSIDERS to be obscene.

http://www.bartcopnation.com/dc/dcbo...8&topic_id=522

The case has an even scarier element to it than simple obscenity. One count was using a computer to distribute obscene material. Now, anybody who has ever uploaded a photo from a computer to the internet and got directly or indirectly paid has used a computer to distribute obscene material. If this verdict holds up in appeal some people in the US are going to have a big problem.

Also, server location was an issue, which is total bogus, but so are many things in this country. (Good thing Jenny rents out NL and DE based servers for a competitive price! Hint, hint! )
__________________
Jenny Seemore
Pornography is the bloody gladiator who stands guard over the First Amendment
Jenny S. is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote