Quote:
Originally Posted by jetjet
could you please define "obscene" for us? is a video of a guy having a dominatrix urinate on his face something that could cause you to be put in jail? should the government even be making such distinctions?
|
I understand what you are saying but my only point is that for the producers that shoot content as extreme as max's content then this case does have some relation to them and they should reconsider shooting extreme shit unless they want to take chances but for the producers that are shooting adult mainstream content such as girls modeling nude, blowjob scenes, handjob scenes...I don't see how that really has any relation to what is going on here. I don't know why some people are freaking out and thinking that just because max was found guilty of obscenity charges that there is not going to be anymore pornography produced in the future.
If shooting content such as girls modeling nude, handjobs, blowjobs....was considered obscene then there would not be an adult industry here in America and it would have been banned decades ago. In my opinion, pornography will always exist....just as it always has existed. You just need to watch what your shooting and don't play with fire because as we have all seen, if you shoot that type of content then your asking for trouble.