|
On a matter of pure entertainment, I'd vote yes. It's kind of like the BCS in college football. I root for the scenario that causes the most chaos and makes the most people look stupid. The way primaries are setup are the most retarded conceopt that anyone could concoct. Superdelegates, caucuses, 30 some-odd primary dates. Just pick one day, give everyone in the party a ballot, the person with the most votes wins. Not exactly rocket science.
But technically speaking, they shouldn't be seated. You can't just change the rules in the middle of the fucking game. You can't just stop in the middle of a poker hand and say "sevens are wild". If people wanted those states seated, they should have bitched and moaned before the election process started. Yes it's not very democratic, but it's the rules the retarded party setup ahead of time.
|