Quote:
Originally Posted by tony404
So its ok if you say your against something then do the opposite as long as its just a little bit?
|
If you're going to roast him for it than have the balls to roast all of them for it INCLUDING Obama... THAT'S my point... I may think Clinton is the best candidiate to win against McCain in November, but you're not going to see me blindly defending her dirty actions, nor attacking someone elses dirt that she's also guilty of. They're all flip floppers, panderers and overall lieing politicians. It's clear you're an Obama suporter but for god sake show some objectivity otherwise you just come off as one more of his rabid mindless supporters.
As for the Keating thing, all I see is a lot of speculation as to what really happened. Maybe he was dirty, maybe he wasn't... Regardless, that was 18 years ago and since then he's been pretty clean. Do you want someone who was caught with their hand close to the cookie jar and straightened themselves out or someone that keeps dipping their hand in until the rules are changed so they can't anymore?
Iran... Don't kid yourself... McCain is just saying what everyone "should" be clueing in to.. Iran, Syria, Iraq... The US is going to have troops on the ground there and will be battling those countries in one way or another for a very long time to come. Oil is in short supply and will get tighter and tighter.. Until the US can get itself far more energy independent, that area of the world is critical to the growth and stability of the country.. Anyone that thinks ANY president isn't going to maintain some control over that area now is deluding themselves. Hitler lost WWII in large part because he lacked the fuel required.. There's no chance in hell the US military will give up that area of the world now.