Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog
and therein lies the problem. Have you seen any of his videos? Notice any artistic value?
I can think of other test cases I would rather rely on.
|
I agree with your point that the content is indeed extreme. The good news about that is that if they can't convict him on obscenity then they can't convict anyone.
Also, his videos
don't have to have artistic value
There are 3 prongs to the Miller test. The burden of proof is on the government. They have to prove him guilty on ALL 3 POINTS.
He only has to prove his innocence on 1. (Actually he doesn't have to "prove" it, but I'm sure you get my point)
Also for the record, it can be literary, political, artistic, or scientific value.