Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw
Those would be pics taken in public - different rules apply.
.
|
Huh? Did you read the thread above and understand it? Because I don't think that your answer makes sense if you were responding to my post above.
I was saying that some webmasters or programs coming along and making web sites full of other people's copyrighted photos that they neither shot themselves nor licensed are essentially stealing the images. After all *someone* owns those photos that the webmaster helped him or herself to, whether it is the paparazzi or the agency he works for or some magazine like the National Enquirer. , right?