View Single Post
Old 05-26-2008, 10:08 AM  
pornlaw
Confirmed User
 
pornlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn View Post
But think about it- someone, whether it is the original paparazzi photographer or the magazines or agencies they work for or some media company like the National Enquirer owns the copyrights to those particular images of Britney Spears, Angelina Jolie etc.
Those would be pics taken in public - different rules apply.

Quote:
Ok then, what about of useing this content to free kind website which is just for traffic generating? Selling clothes.. and that kinda stuff? I am sure there are tons of that kind of sites..
Thats a not a "free" website. Its a commercial website and there's no difference. They could still claim any profits generated by it, through it or because of it.
__________________
Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
pornlaw is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote