Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Doctor
Those two cases are very different than going after someone like say Bangbros or Naughty America.
The red rose case had to do with CP, which is a totally different beast than obscenity. Text or not, internet or not, it doesn't belong in an obscenity discussion.
In the Ray Guhn case the charges range from racketeering to prostitution, fraud, and making or promoting obscene performances. So again, that's not a cut and dried obscenity prosecution based on content available only via the internet.
|
Ah, sorry -- I guess I kinda missed your point, and that you were speaking of cases where obscenity was the only charge/issue at hand. In Fletcher's case, the charge itself was obscenity, and not anything relating to CP, but clearly the fact that the stories involved children was the reason for the charge being brought in the first place.