Quote:
Originally Posted by CAMOKAT
No, the numbers prove otherwise. Obviously, when compared to Obama more people would prefer her over Obama. Im just stating facts, not my opinion. If you want to see someone?s opinion please read pussyservers indistinct nonsense. You do understand that its polls.. Actual polls show that Clinton is in better sape. Now, you obviously like Obama better and will be making every excuse to prove otherwise, but I showed you actual polls conducted by people that specialize in it.. Once again, NOT OPINION. Now, you have an opinion? that its to early to say and that things will change. Now that?s an opinion.
|
Polls are not FACTS.
You can say it's a "fact" that she is polling better in certain states right now against McCain. That's true....but you're trying to extrapolate that to a "fact" that says Obama will lose in November.
She has always and will always poll better in those states than Obama. When it comes to the south and industrial midwest John Edwards polls better than both of them.
So what?
Obama's electoral map has always been different than hers.
Besides, polls done this far out are meaningless. If they were an indicator of who would win, Hillary would have won every primary by 20+ points, and Michael Dukakis, Ross Perot, and John Kerry all would have been President.