|
The way I understand this is that the content itself is irrelevant. It doesn't matter if it's an 80yo man or a 18yo girl dressed up in a school outfit with stuffed animals all around.
This decision in my view targets people who have content - any content, or even no content at all - that falsely promote it as underage materials.
And to the idiots in this thread saying it won't stand up, who is going to strike down a ruling by the US Supreme Court?
|