View Single Post
Old 05-19-2008, 04:27 PM  
severe
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 331
what does this court decision have anything to do with legal websites? the guy actually possessed cp and tried to sell/distribute it.

Quote:
"Dad of toddler has 'good' pics of her an me for swap of your toddler pics, or live cam."

After the initial photo exchange, Williams allegedly posted seven images of actual minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct. Agents who executed a search warrant found 22 child pornography images on Williams' home computer.

Williams also was convicted of possession of child pornography. That conviction, and the resulting five-year prison term, was not challenged.
are you really gonna sit there an say this cp worthless pos shouldn't get the extra time because that bolded is protected by freedom of speech?

consider for a minute if they ruled the opposite way the consequence of such a ruling.
severe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote