View Single Post
Old 05-19-2008, 11:09 AM  
MrPinks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 1,767
Yes, but after reading the law and Souter's and Ginsbergs statement as to why they oppose the law, is quite disturbing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1R3K View Post
the keywords here are "illegal images".

there is no way they can uphold that promoting a teen image of someone 18-19, are in fact teens. so suck it u.s.a. they can pass all the laws they want, but if you are not doing anything wrong you don't have anything to worry about.

TEEN does in fact mean 18 and 19 eightTEEN, and nineTEEN respectively. They can't change the meaning of a word.
MrPinks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote