Quote:
Originally posted by stocktrader23
Look, I'm not going to argue with you on this. If you want to read what hundreds of people that have been directly involved in prosecuting things such as this have to say on the subject just look it up on google. It really doesn't matter what you think on it. It's the feds definition. They will start going after "vanilla" sex again. This conservative government is nothing to take lightly.
|
Look, I HAVE been prosecuted for this. And you're just flat out wrong to say "There is a precedent there that any and all actual sex is obscene by law. If the feds took you to trial on this they aren't asking the jury if they think it's obscene and that's it. They are going to show that it has already been found to be obscene and tell them they need to go by that law."
Your post above is relevant in the fact that it's called the Miller Test. That's what defines obscene material, and it has to be proven in each individual case.
You may be correct that "vanilla sex" is something they might try to go after, but they still have to prove it obscene.