Bunch of impulse posters in this thread have these very well fixed, but sadly irrelevant preconceived notions as to what I'm saying. Let's get through some of them (read this until you comprehend it, then learn it. There will be tests later on, all through the reminder of your life) :
1. "partnership = 50%". That'd be a very narrow special case of a partnership. A partnership is any arrangement in which two or more entities agree to specified work together for unspecified gain. That's all it is. Whenever you are working with someone, but can not specify the dollar ammount that work will earn you, you're in a partnership. Some may be suckier than others, but there's no intrinsic fairness, equality, or other such unexamined "implicit social justice" ingredients to it. A partnership is just a deal, and like any deal, it's as good as the people making it.
2. "there can be a situation in which NO deal can be made". The only case when a deal can not be made is when the parties aren't trustworthy. Claiming that someone doing one fraction of a job, and someone else doing the remainder, can not result in a partnership is essentially saying "I'm not a businessman". It makes you look bad, because then what are you, a con man ? Way to give yourself away, and it's not the first time you do in my threads, they're kinda designed for it, it's still kinda sad.
3. "fluffygrrl is evil/a guy/mentally so and so/etc". Yeah, right.
Quote:
|
For what you want all I would give you as a %'s is MAYBE 3% and that's being generous. All I'm saying is that you need to rethink your approach.
|
Tell you what, I might agree to 3% and I might agree to 0.3%, and I might agree to nothing at all till you make your investment back, and I might agree to 0% if conversions are under 1:x and 1% if they go over 1:x and 10% if they go over 1:y and 50% if they go over 1:z, there's no limit as to what the deal can be.
It just has to make sense for both parties.