Quote:
Originally posted by Lenny2
Cut it out with the word parsing crap. Just because Dubya calls them his tax cut plan, they are two separate and totally different tax bills. The first one was passed as an income tax cut, and the second one is coming in the form of an "economic stimulus package"
And one may stay while the other one gets thrown out of congress. So they are two different bills, one that gave an accross the board rate cut, and one that cuts a tax that almost solely benefits the top 1% of Americans.
|
if you keep lying, we'll just ignore you.
this is all one plan but lets humor you and *pretend* it isn't. (liberals like the world of make believe)
why shouldn't the people paying more than
double the % what others pay get a tax break?
Quote:
Originally posted by Lenny2
As for the Reagan tax cuts, they were revenue neutral.
|
back that up with facts please. saying it doesn't make it so.
Quote:
Originally posted by Lenny2
There is still no conclusive evidence that the tax cuts had anything to do with the economic growth of the 80's.
|
and none that it didn't.
Quote:
Originally posted by Lenny2
A few things that did have a lot to do with that growth were the end of the oil embargo which crippled the economy under the Carter administration, and a military buildup that for all intents and purposes put us into a "wartime economy".
It also left us 5 trillion dollars in debt. .
|
are you saying you liked the world under the carter admin?
I can't really tell.
Quote:
Originally posted by Lenny2
Now, are you just going to reply and call me names? Or can you actually discuss the issue without making it personal?
|
Name calling is fun
