View Single Post
Old 04-23-2008, 01:15 PM  
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiplashDug View Post
TRUE PRODUCTION WOULD RUN 25 YEARS

First, environmentalists took the lowest possible estimate of the ANWR's potential recoverable oil reserves -- about 5.7 billion barrels--and cut it by roughly 40 percent to around 3.4 billion barrels. Then they assumed that the oil would be produced at roughly 19 million barrels per day (b/d).

But the most likely estimate places the ANWR's recoverable reserves at an estimated 10.3 billion barrels -- more than three times the amount these environmentalists claim.

Moreover, any geologist would tell you that the notion of producing oil from the North Slope at a rate of 19 million b/d is sheer nonsense for at least two reasons.

First, when an oil field is brought into production, it takes time to reach its optimum output. After it does, it begins to decline as the resource is exhausted.

In the case of the ANWR, it is expected that production would build to 2 million b/d and then decline. In practice, this means the ANWR would produce for at least 25 years -- not six months.


...... read full story
Well I'm not making up anything. There are maybe at most 10.4 billion barrels of oil there. We currently use 24 million a day. Do the math. 24 million divided by 10.4 billion = 433 days worth of oil. Of course you can't get all the oil out at once and if you spread it out over 25 years that area would supply about 4% of our oil needs daily if our needs didn't increase over the next 25 year which they would. Everyone drivng a car that got 32 MPG would save more barrels of oil that that.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote