GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

Tom_PM · 04-23-2008, 08:43 AM

And by the way, to Clintons enormous credit, she won this race after a month and a half that included 2 solid weeks of the media asking "Should Hillary Quit?". Even doing hour long interviews trying to speculate on if the media people thought she should quit, and why.. even after she said clearly she wasn't of course.

An orgy of pundits amusing themselves on a question they already knew the answer to, without regard to how it might affect the votes. Purely negative is the only way Clinton could possibly see that. Combined with Obamas massively huge stash of pure cash spent on ads and events all over the state. How could Obama not win that freaking state is beyond me. He had everything going for him, including a distracted media base with nothing better to do than bash his opponent bloody for 6 weeks. And he only managed to win Philadelphia for the most part. I mean holy shit.

Anyone who thinks that a superdelegate voting for the person with 51.3% of the vote or the person with 48.7% of the vote is "giving" or "stealing" or "alienating" is simply crazy. Parroting such nonsense just illustrates a particular brand of spin.

The only margin needed to win, according to Obama, is 51%. Why is it different for Clinton? Spin is why.

04-23-2008, 08:43 AM
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	And by the way, to Clintons enormous credit, she won this race after a month and a half that included 2 solid weeks of the media asking "Should Hillary Quit?". Even doing hour long interviews trying to speculate on if the media people thought she should quit, and why.. even after she said clearly she wasn't of course. An orgy of pundits amusing themselves on a question they already knew the answer to, without regard to how it might affect the votes. Purely negative is the only way Clinton could possibly see that. Combined with Obamas massively huge stash of pure cash spent on ads and events all over the state. How could Obama not win that freaking state is beyond me. He had everything going for him, including a distracted media base with nothing better to do than bash his opponent bloody for 6 weeks. And he only managed to win Philadelphia for the most part. I mean holy shit. Anyone who thinks that a superdelegate voting for the person with 51.3% of the vote or the person with 48.7% of the vote is "giving" or "stealing" or "alienating" is simply crazy. Parroting such nonsense just illustrates a particular brand of spin. The only margin needed to win, according to Obama, is 51%. Why is it different for Clinton? Spin is why. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.