Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
I'm appalled at how many (not all) of you are running sites bragging about "HD" and your content looks like ass. You can't simply swap out your camera for an HD cam and expect it to look great without adjustments. For starters you need a lot more light than you're used to. Hence why so many of the content looks darker than it should. What is the point of shooting in HD if it looks like shit?
Secondly, choose your models better. The point of HD is that it sees EVERYTHING. That means when you hire models with jacked up legs, scars, stretch marks or has a hairy body, IT SHOWS IT!!!
I'm not going to name any names but I'm seeing some top programs who was shooting KILLER content before, now have dark and lifeless looking videos.
I'll end this rant by saying that I can't stand downloading HD videos anyway. They are too big and unless you are on a blazing connection, they just take too long. I'm sitting here with my cock on my hand, wanting to cum, and it takes a fucking hour to download some of these videos. Pornography is an impulse industry. That means guys want INSTANT gratification. Translated, men want to cum RIGHT NOW, not in an hour. Those of you with cocks should know what I'm talking about.
 |
Great post and spot on. The problem is sometimes the money top programs are prepared to pay a shooter, pay peanuts get monkies.
Plus the thinking that the image quality = porn quality. Techies think yes, porn consumers might be thinking no. Because after joining sites that with HD content that got it wrong they start to think HD is a bad thing.
As others have pointed out all HD does is expose flaws of those who can't use it.