Quote:
Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
My point was it could easily be used for a major motion picture and you wouldnt know the diff. Not that it looked better than what hollywood produces. It was in response to the guy saying that it was completely unrealistic that porn could look as good as a trailer such as the ones on hulu produced for mainstream motion pictures.  |
because all the samples on the hulu pages were movies shot in film (not at 1920 pixels wide, but more like 3000+ pixels wide), the edited in native resolution, the resized down to 'HD', then encoded with a custom matrix PER scene at different bitrates with more than 2 passes per scene, then all scenes joined into a final trailer, then the process was repeated for the next trailer.
Of course I know many movies (usually STV) are shot in HDV cameras. but no pro movies (like the trailers at hulu) use such a lossy format to capture raw footage. That's why I said is unrealistic to expect and get the same quality out of a cheap HDV or h.264 HD camera.
