Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPinks
I would be all for 2257 if it was modified to be practical and clear cut. First, 2257 needs to cut out the secondary producer bullshit. Primary producers are the ones producing the content, they need to be responsible enough to make sure the content they are producing is legal.
|
you have completely missed my point and i'll stop now since i'll just end up repeating myself. . you are still stuck on 2257.
your last comment makes me believe that if you had the underage content on your website (unknowingly) because you trusted that the content producer would be responsible enough to have over 18 models (and don't forget, they can be duped with a fake ID (traci lords)), that you seem to think you are immune from being prosecuted for CP possession and distribution.
I realize that your mrpinks.com website does not have images so you don't have to worry about 2257.
But for those that are reading, play this little game at home, pick any image/video on your website and can you name what content producer it came from? If the filenames of the image/videos from a content producer were alerted to be underage, could you track those images down on your server?
Fight the no consolation prize!