Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Spot on. There are a lot of whining bitches on another thread saying YouTube and Myspace type sites should not be held responsible for the content they have. Yet when it's a porn Tube site they do have to be responsible. Not sure why one is right and the other wrong.
|
They are both wrong you dumb fuck. They should be held responsible and it's lame that an entire business model is built around this 'I didn't know they uploaded that (wink, wink)?. Youtube, Veoh, etc... it's all built around stolen content and after it got that initial traffic surge, then they tried to be more vigilant about policing the stolen material. And I don't get why these sites are 2257 exempt.
And why would anyone buy porn when you have redtube, or tube8, etc...? What is the average video length of the top rated section on these sites? So there's thousands of 15+ minute videos and people are going to pay money to get a membership to site X ?
Do people not realize that the business model of youtube doesn't map back to the porn industry. Youtube is selling advertisements, they are not selling samples to get memberships. The youtube porn clones are going to just sell ads and the legality of the content on the site doesn't matter.