Hey guess what? Your experts were wrong before
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...944914,00.html
I do not know why you quoted me I am only quoting your so called experts. It is bizarre to me that anyone would blindly follow anything, religion or science because todays "experts" claim they know everything. And when global warming fails these so called experts say that regular weather is proof of global warming. Sorry I think the verdict is still out. If you base your sound science on assumptions that their foundations are correct there is a lot of room for error.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Libertine
I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that none of you have PhDs in any field related to climate science. Am I right?
If I am indeed right, it would appear that all of you are commenting on a field which you know relatively little about, and are arriving at a different conclusion than the bulk of the scientists actually working in this particular field.
That, to me, is bizarre.
Compare it with a group of medical doctors disagreeing with the majority of a group of programmers on the value of IPv6 as a successor to IPv4.
Compare it with a group of programmers disagreeing with the majority of a group of medical doctors on the correct method of catheterisation.
Hell, compare it with a group of environmental scientists deciding that the future of adult lies in TGP2.
Now, what I'm curious about is why you people take the word of a minority of scientists whose theories you don't fully understand over that of a majority of scientists whose theories you don't fully understand.
|