Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
I'm not really sure where this comes from. It makes no sense and proves no point.
|
he is making an assertion without a foundation of proof JUST LIKE YOU WERE.
Copyright infringement is not theft because it does not deny you possession of the property, which means it does not meet the minimum requirements to be classified as theft
It is closer to "fraud" , in that you are cheating someone out of the rightful revenue by misrepresenting yourself to have a right you do not have.
But there is the rub, if you actually have bought or were given the right to view/listen to/ install etc you CAN'T be guilty of fraudlently misrepresenting "yourself to have a right to view/listen to/install etc"