Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhesus
Sure dude, make the cat believe an 18+ y.o. girl walks around with the things in her hair she does and the clothes she wears, the bears and the flowers. Even in the case she does (in which case I suspect there's an indication for mental retardation and "consent" is a debatable term), this clearly caters to those who like girls in primary school. Not even high school, as wdsguy suggested.
Let's cut the talk about "consenting adults" and sales figures (animal porn sells well too and is legal in many countries, that doesn't mean it's right), and let's dive straight into the issue: you know this looks as wrong as it gets within the boundaries of porn-regulating laws.
|
No, I don't know that. Not a single law in place that even suggests that.
And yes, she does dress like that. Search GFY for the story about how we got thrown out of the Hard Rock Cafe because of how young she looks.
Pretty fucked up of you to suggest that she is retarded just because you don't agree with how she chooses to present herself.
Those who protest the most are usually the ones jerking off to it. Would you like a free month membership to littlelupe.com?