Quote:
Originally Posted by Libertine
I would have loved to have sex with her when I was 14 years old. In fact, I did have sex with a female student teacher 10 years older than me when I was 14 years old. It was great.
|
14 year olds want to do a lot of stuff they shouldn't. That's why they are considered MINORS. They are not mature enough to make sound decisions.
Quote:
|
Age, looks and gender do matter here, because with an attractive woman in her twenties, chances are rather higher that the "victim" was a willing participant than they would be with a fat, ugly man in his fifties.
|
Looks shouldn't matter. So Brad Pitt can't possibly be a rapist ever? Justice is supposed to be blind. The middle teacher is not attractive so she is a rapist and the others aren't because there is no way those boys WILLINGLY fucked her?
Quote:
|
Chances of the boy being traumatized by this particular encounter are very slim. Or at least, they would be, hadn't the law decided to step in, label the boy a victim, put the woman he had sex with in prison, and tell him he's been through a sad, shocking, traumatizing, tragic experience.
|
but if if you had a 14 year old daughter and she had a teacher that looked like Brad Pitt it wouldn't matter to you if she was willing or the fact he was attractive, you'd want him in jail. At least most of society would. Some how a 14 year old girl is traumatized by sex, but boys aren't even though it's a proven fact that girls are more mature than boys. So either neither are traumatized adn grown-up should be able to have sex wit 14 year olds. Or they both are and it should be illegal. So which is it. A or B?
Also if this involved gay sex, attractiveness wouldn't mater to you either. You are being so hypocritical.
Quote:
|
They should all lose their jobs, yes. None of them should go to prison, though.
|
Sorry the first one should. Sorry a 28 year old should NOT find a 14 year old sexual arousing. Male, female doesn't matter.