Quote:
Originally posted by ThunderBalls
Ok, but tell me, who do you really think is the bigger threat.....Iraq, North Korea, or Bin Laden?
|
I think all three deserve to be dealt with.
Personally, I don't think N. Korea has any intention of nuking anyone. They want to get the US to the bargaining table for something so they're running their yappers. When someone's waving a nuke and yelling "We'll kill you all" it's kind of hard to pile up the troops and go blasting in though. This isn't Duke Nukem or Command and Conquer (or whatever that game is called). So something else will be done.
Whether or not Bush tells you everything that's going on, the hunt for Osama does continue. People think that because you have expensive satellites, you should be able to find anyone you want in a heartbeat, but it doesn't work like that. The hunt continues and eventually he will be caught. People have no patience.
Right now, though, Saddam is attempting to develop weapons like N. Korea has. If you ignore him now, you'll have another N. Korea on your hands. Then what? Then people will complain the US didn't stop them when they had the chance.
Everyone who complains has no alternative suggestions, other than "leave them all alone" which is not an acceptable option.
I'm sure if we could snap our fingers and take care of all three at once, we would. But it's not that easy.
And like I said, if we did invade N. Korea and not Iraq people would complain anyways because we aren't killing all the bad guys in one fell swoop.
So for now, each one is being dealt with in the appropriate manner, in my opinion. If someone has a better idea, I'm sure the world would love to hear it. And "leave them alone they didn't do anything" is not acceptable.