GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - No Country for Old Men discussion (Spoiler)

marketsmart · 03-17-2008, 11:12 PM

actually, i think the ending meant that there was actually no difference between the past and present when it comes to violence..

he said his dream was about his father and his father carried a flame that could make a fire at any time..

to me, it meant that violence can be born at any time no matter how far we progress as a people or how much time passes.. just my 2 cents...

also, if you pay attention to the beggining monologue of how he sent the boy to the electric chair and about how it wasnt a crime of passion, i think the whole movie is about the fact that violence and wickedness doesnt neccessarily have to have a reason or a purpose, its just there sometimes...

03-17-2008, 11:12 PM
marketsmart HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane Posts: 20,419	actually, i think the ending meant that there was actually no difference between the past and present when it comes to violence.. he said his dream was about his father and his father carried a flame that could make a fire at any time.. to me, it meant that violence can be born at any time no matter how far we progress as a people or how much time passes.. just my 2 cents... also, if you pay attention to the beggining monologue of how he sent the boy to the electric chair and about how it wasnt a crime of passion, i think the whole movie is about the fact that violence and wickedness doesnt neccessarily have to have a reason or a purpose, its just there sometimes...