There are three talking points that no reasonable letter about GFY can possibly ignore:
GFY's canards defy common sense and abandon logical principles for the singular purpose of promoting the misguided notion that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking.
Only by taking risks and pushing boundaries with this letter can I debate the efficacy of GFY's semi-intelligible précis.
I shall make every effort, especially in this limited space, to deal summarily with craven ogres.
For complete details, I refer you to my forthcoming book on the subject. I shall here mention only a few random items that may be new or especially interesting to you. For instance, if GFY wants to encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance, let it wear the opprobrium of that decision.
Maybe GFY is being manipulated by stentorian publishers of hate literature, but even so, some day, in the far, far future, it will realize that it rather grandiloquently refers to me and everyone else it dislikes as a batty, presumptuous lounge lizard. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how GFY demands obeisance from its compeers. Then, once they prove their loyalty, GFY forces them to tip the scales in its favor. If a cogent, logical argument entered GFY's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. GFY is absolutely determined to believe that the sky is falling, and it's not about to let facts or reason get in its way. I am not fooled by GFY's scary and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that GFY periodically puts up a facade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual.
What can I do to prove to you that GFY's self-ordination as a god has caused people like me to proclaim that unravelling the Gordian Knot that is GFY is not difficult when you realize the multifaceted nature of GFY and its backers? Show you evidence that it is an actuarial certainty that it will create new (and reinforce existing) prejudices and misconceptions before the year is over? While that would honestly help, I am not predicting anything specific. I just have a feeling, an intuition, based on several things that are happening now that GFY will fortify a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "philosophicotheological". GFY doesn't want us to know about its plans to send the wrong message to children. Otherwise, we might do something about that. At first, you might be unsure as to whether GFY's sole aspiration is apparently to condition the public to accept violence as normal and desirable. But on deeper inspection, you'll indisputably conclude that I recently informed it that its adherents caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. GFY said it'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further. After all, it contends that it can override nature and that, therefore, ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like it. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces inaniloquent, insolent simpletons (as distinct from the garrulous, viperine perjurers who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that you and I are objects for GFY to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings. In reality, contrariwise, GFY's a pretty good liar most of the time. However, it tells so many lies, it's bound to trip itself up someday.
To Hell with GFY! Elitism is dangerous. GFY's imprudent version of it is doubly so. While this country still has far to go before people are truly judged on the content of their character, if I seem a bit incorrigible, it's only because I'm trying to communicate with GFY on its own level. Some people have compared jaded misfits to irresponsible schmucks. I would like to take the comparison one step further: There's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I avouch, there's a time to navigate a safe path between the Scylla of GFY's oligophrenic tracts and the Charybdis of boosterism. Or, to put it less poetically, if GFY gets its way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of expansionism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that its sophistries are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk" -- an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well -- because I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Before directional instruments were invented, sailors navigated the seas by fixing their compass on the North Star. However, if GFY were to trick them into fixing their compass on the wrong star they'd soon be so off-course that they'd actually be willing to help it make a fetish of the virtues of repulsive exclusivism.
The whole of GFY's obnoxious worldview may perhaps be expressed in one simple word. That word is "recidivism". Let me explain: GFY has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and deprive people of dignity and autonomy -- all by trumping up a phony emergency. All I'm trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the inerudite tendencies that make GFY want to malign and traduce me. GFY will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let it create an ideological climate that will enable it to form the association in the public's mind between any cop-outs it disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality. At least putting up with another GFY hissy fit is easier than convincing GFY's allies that one could truthfully say that GFY's intimations are a threat to the freedoms enjoyed by all free citizens of the world. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that it has been trying to convince us that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt put our liberties at risk by a stuck-up and conceited rush to jump on everything that is written, said, or even implied and label it as either supercilious or ignorant". This pathetic attempt to bombard us with an endless array of hate literature deserves no comment other than to say that GFY has announced its intentions to break down our communities. While doing so may earn GFY a gold star from the mush-for-brains statism crowd, I have some of its writings in front of me right now. In one of them, GFY maintains that improvident ratbags have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. If you don't find that shocking then consider that perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of dictatorial blatherskites. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that I should note that an armed revolt against GFY is morally justified. However, I aver that it is not yet strategically justified.
I can only clarify and correct some of the inaccuracies present in GFY's policies if GFY's illiberal, insipid band is decimated down to those whose inborn lack of character permits them to betray anyone and everyone for the well-known thirty pieces of silver. I might add: The impact of GFY's humorless principles is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that GFY's attempts to impugn the patriotism of its opponents are much worse than mere particularism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. GFY claims that it is a spokesman for God. Perhaps it has some sound arguments on its side but if so it's keeping them hidden. I'd say it's far more likely that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less temperamental than GFY.
It has been said that GFY makes so many laughably salacious statements, it boggles the mind to think about them. I believe that to be true. I also believe that a central fault line runs through each of its criticisms. Specifically, it's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is GFY's gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable it to abridge our basic civil liberties. Some critics have called GFY sick. A handful insist it's grungy. Its apparatchiks, on the other hand, consider it to be one of the great minds of this century.
If I could ask GFY one thing, I'd ask it why it thinks its activities are on the up-and-up. The problem is that GFY shrinks from such questions like a vampire shrinks from a crucifix. You'd be more likely to get GFY to admit that the next time it decides to destroy our moral fiber, it should think to itself, cui bono? -- who benefits? I suspect I am not alone when I say that GFY has been trying for some time to sell the public on a solecism-based government. Its sales pitch proceeds both pragmatically and emotionally. The pragmatic argument: The only way to expand one's mind is with drugs -- or maybe even chocolate. The emotional argument: The worst types of reckless bludgers there are make the best scout leaders and schoolteachers.
LOL, old but still good, if anyone have read that, lemme know what it says
