Quote:
Originally Posted by Headless
Actually, youre wrong. It was not a minor fire. It's structure was severly damaged from the event.
|
its structure being damaged has no relation to the strength of the fire only the ability to fight it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Headless
The fire crews couldnt get it under control most of the day and that is why she came down.
|
again the ability of the fire fighters to stop the fire has no relation to the strength of the fire, they had plenty of other things to do and way less manpower or ability to do it. this doesnt make it a "major" firew , it makes it a minor fire with little ability to fight it
i saw the fire with my own eyes, it was certainly NOT a major fire. I'm not a firefighter , but i would guess at any other time by itself the fire would have been easy to control.If your step-father was there and is a firefighter , then i would trust his opinion more than mine but he would never convince me it was a major fire. If he told me it was a minor fire but the ability to fight it was hampered by structural damage and lack of manpower THAT i would believe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Headless
my father in law tell my wife and I how at one point they knew it was going to come down if they couldnt control the fire.
|
isnt the same true about any fire ? if i lit a garbage can on fire in the sears tower it would def be considered a "minor fire" but if it couldnt be controlled due to many other factors , then it would eventually bring the building down , correct ?
wouldnt it be safe to say ANY building on fire will come down if they cant control the fire, no matter how small the fire is ?
if you pull everyone out of a "controllable" fire , doesnt it become uncontrollable ?