View Single Post
Old 03-05-2008, 05:33 AM  
commonsense
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by ismokeblunts View Post
Rise above the competition. There IS competition you realize right? What part of this are people not putting together? There's a reason why one girl's number of subscribers are consistently higher than the next. She's been judged as having a more desirable site than the compeition she's been compared to by the surfers. Mind you I'm not solely speaking about comparing the models themselves but their sites against one another. Take 1000 surfers and give them a choice to take a free pass out of 1000 sites, and you're going to wind up with one girl who gets more sales than the rest. Due to her visual appeal, her site's appeal, the personality and feel she puts across, the drive the program puts behind promoting her site, etc etc. There's more than one factor dictating success, but you said it yourself, you promote 800+ sologirls, which is probably still far from covering all of them. Webmasters are going to do their best to pick which sites they think are going to sell the best for them. Now out of the 800 sites you promote it's probably safe to say a good portion of those sites are long dead, the girl has nothing to do with them personally, the quality of the site and it's content is borderline, or whatever. How to some program owners and independent sologirls, maybe 20-30 total signups a month is success, but there are certainly girls out there doing A LOT more sales than that. Models who put on regular camshows and chats, update their sites two or more times a week, have a steady supply of fresh quality video and hot photo sets, and just generally DELIVER, and stay in it for the long haul (2+ years IS a long haul, haha). If you as a program owner are happy with your sales and the model is happy with what she's making, nobody is losing any. but to si there and say there is no competition, or that you can't compare girls and their sites IS RIDICULOUS...
For the sake of discussion, you seem to think that all sologirls have the same amount of traffic and marketing when they launch, and grow or not from there. Not at all like that. Or that all sales are affiliate driven. We'll never know who will sell the best since no one has access to that much information. Maybe Bike or one of the directories, but even they push some girls harder than others. Comparing sologirls is comparing apples or oranges, since they are all different PEOPLE


The vast majority of sologirl sites don't have the model personally involved and never have, probably 98% of them. I'm cool with that for good reason, model owned sites rarely last a long time. They have some life changing event and want to take the site down.


I can't even say that there is a correlation between sales and things like cam shows, since sales and rebills can be just as good on "dead" sologirl site. I can't explain it, other than the member totally loves the girl or they died and are just rebilling. As long as the site updates on a regular schedule and appears to be current, thats what matters. But there are sites with an embarrassing low quantity of content and should become part of a network instead of solo separately.


It's more about matching the surfer with the girl they will fall in love with, that seems the main thing to get people to buy. Maybe the girl reminds them of a past girlfriend, their secretary, a neighborhood girl, whatever. A guy really has to dig a girls looks in the first place to even join a sologirl site.


This is all a marketing question anyways, as to why certain sologirls are marketed better than others, and more webmasters want to sell them. Thats all it comes down to. Some sologirls have that "it" factor that makes you think they'll sell, even if they don't. And you don't take down their links cause their hot, or have a good SE listing on their name, or you personally like the site even if you never make sales with them.


I have a few sponsors like that. 0:tens of thousands but still leave up the links.

Last edited by commonsense; 03-05-2008 at 05:35 AM..
commonsense is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote