Quote:
Originally posted by Scootermuze
If it was 'questionable' content, and Yahoo sent it, then they should be just as much the criminal as the recipient..
Reproduction for purposes of distribution is worse than simple possession..
Somethin wrong with this picture..
|
The motherfucker put a cancel on the order and they sent it to him anyway? If that isn't entrapment, what is? Reading the article one gets a feeling for the average intelligence in Kansas. They have to spell shit out like "obscenity is illegal - pornography is not" and then they went on to define "prurient" for their idiot readers.