Quote:
Originally Posted by EZRhino
Trying to stop a phenomenon like tube sites is a major undertaking, once they are well established. There are only two ways to deal with tube sites, in my opinion. One; disrupt the system from within. For example, studios that went after napster started loading the system with bogus content that either was no good or played for a little while and then went to shit. This filtered out the casual users, who then went to other file sharing sites. Second way, is to sue them into oblivion. And we all know the end result is, if you put enough money into the suit. I believe in the first is a better idea. It will eventually ruin the reliability of the content to the end user. Since most of the content on these tube sites aren’t handpicked, and need their search engine to display the desired content. Fill it with junk that matches the search terms for your content or put in content that you normally would give away in tours, with the right search terms. Thus, knocking down the position of the pirated versions in the search results. It’s a lot of work but, it’s cheaper than a lawyer. Believe me I speak from experience about the costs of a good lawyer.
|
Thats good one but it will lead to traffic seeing out the least interrupted, and in Flash Video people are not waiting for the download to view a file.
No tube site operator is going willingly seed his site with bullshit clips that are fake, it's not possible. Don't get me wrong though I thought about this same line of thought for a while.
Look at the function from the simplist of procedure's the mechanic's and it more or less dispoils to the thoughts I have presented here.