Originally Posted by AlienQ

Well you have to look at the reasons why Napster was forced to comply with Copyrights and understand the goings on.

Now the Flash Pluggin is operating in much the same.

Napster was merely a "pluggin" by concept for p2p.

I am not talking about P2P in this topic.
I am talking about regulating and enforcing copyright on URLS that use Flash Based video's.

Like i said dumb people are entitled to an opinion, thats the sad truth of today. Maybe my idea is dumb to you, yet perhaps it will catch on to people that actually are able to do something about this problem.

It is a very real problem right now and this concept is merely a piece to a complex problem that is causing much money lost on the part of copyright holders.

I am not saying go after the consumer with authorization, I am saying go after the site operator by URL in scheme that helps Content companies to realise a URL verify a URL and ultimatly halt play back on an end user who's Flash Pluggin Verifies whether or not a given URL has the right to transmit the video being requested.