|
Moniker.com and Oversee.net / DomainSponsor reps have finally shed a little light on the issue - they told me that indeed (as I had postulated earlier) Skenzo, immediately after suddenly terminating the contract after the Oversee.net takeover, have done an unusually stringent fraud adjustment of November revenues.
It's clear to me this is theft of money that is owed, and between the lines, this much is clear to the reps in question as well.
I was also told that Moniker are yet to be paid December revenues by Skenzo. Again, this is against contract (although it was unilaterally terminated).
If this is all true, lot of blame in this issue should go to the cowboys that Skenzo are.
However, for me, I blame Moniker.com, because they are the ones that are supposed to pay me and I'm not dealing with Skenzo. Why don't Moniker fight this in court? The case is as clear as it gets. Naturally, we don't know about other provisions their contract may have had. I feel to believe, though, that this can be held up in court.
I blame Moniker for their extremely poor handling of the issue. Would they have communicated with us about it, everything would have been different. The principles are the same - Moniker is supposed to pay us and we have little to do with Skenzo, but humanity would have given us some more patience.
However, Monte Cahn has been telling some blank-faced lies and categorically omitted lots of information, as other Moniker reps have done. This is unforgivable.
The reps mentioned still don't answer my repetitively asked question why there has never been any form of communication. Moniker fail in communicating properly, hence the need for this post (and bump of this PR drama).
I expect some more replies and will post to inform.
|