Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossman
I think most paysite owners who have licensed content would not mind paying, if the content producers/resellers actual did something proactive, and did more than promise to go after anyone who broke the rules of the license or stole their content. Add the cost to when paysites are buying content - ex. 1% of total to anti-piracy fund or a fixed amount per video/picture, and inform paysite owners to report ANY suspects URLs to the content owner or his/her anti-piracy organization.
|
Ups! should say anti-piracy
Guess I need to re-read my posts before posting - but this issue is so frustrating, since the content owners/rellers are holding the key to solve the problem. The key is to enforcing the licenses they give out. When a paysite owner pays for the content, then he/she actual think that the content owner/reseller is serious about going after those that do not.
Content owners/reseller
-----------------------
Enforce your licenses
Inform paysite owners to report any suspect urls having the content, which he/she have just licensed.
Paysite owners
---------------
ONLY buy from content owners/resellers who promise to prolong the value of the content you are buying by going after thieves, and other licensors who are breaking the rules of the license.
Inform content owners/reselles about suspecting urls - drop content owners/resellers who do nothing with the information.