Quote:
Originally posted by dacash
Ok i'll stop joking around, my point is that North Korea is a bigger problem then Irak, and far more dangerous, and Diabolic then Saddam.
Let's take this to a local senario.
Example: You have Mr. B in one corner, he owns a Kwicky mart, and then you have Mr. Z that works at the Tuna Factory.
Let's say that Mr. B is mean to everyone, and has hurt people and breaks the agreement he made with the community. and Mr. B makes $100 000 with his Store.
Let's say that Mr. Z is mean to everyone, and has hurt people and breaks the agreement he made with the community.and Mr. Z makes $20 000 with his job.
But now you think that Mr. B has a Bazooka hidden in his Kwicky Mart somewhere, and you are looking for it for the past 4 months and you can't find it. (you have satelitte photos of a Kraft Dinner box that inside is hidden a Bazooka.
Mr. Z says to you that He has a Bazooka in his hands, he will shoot you if you don't smarten the fuck up adn don't start sending Oil back his way. Also says to his Neihbors if they say one world they are KABOOM.
So you tell me who is the bigger threat.
|
Would it make you happier if we go into N. Korea first? Then once they're disarmed we take on Iraq?
Either way, Iraq has to be dealt with. Left to their own devices, Saddam will eventually get some nukes himself.
N. Korea is surrounded by countries (China, Japan) with some serious firepower themselves, who are well aware of what's going on there. Why can't they handle it for us for a change? We got our hands full in the Middle East.