View Single Post
Old 02-07-2008, 06:27 PM  
drjones
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Tom View Post
Neither democratic candidates plans (dont know if the republicans have plans they've put out), require you to drop your private insurance or change anything at all. Of course any tax money it needs you wont be able to opt out of, but thats how it is now with so many things. Paying school tax if you have no kids would be similar imho. Or if you have kids and send them to private schools, you're kinda paying twice.

On tax increases, lets also bear in mind that there is so much "pork" that can be cut, it wont be as if we're starting from 0. We'll need to cut the crap first. Requiring congress members to attach their names to their 11th hour pork will help us weed out the idiots in time.

Besides all that, I'll personally never forget watching my neighbor get her new shiny car, tell me she's moving into a house she bought, and having her *welfare* check accidently delivered to my mailbox fuck, I mean come on. There's enough built-in error to be trimmed to get this all done with barely any monetary pain at all. And thats really the bottom line isn't it?

If you dont HAVE TO switch from your current health care status, and it doesnt cost you MORE money when all the negatives are deducted and positives added.. then surely there is no remaining issue to fight over?
Thats the gist of it right there. I'm not convinced its such a good idea to start handing more of our money to the people who have made careers out of money mismanagement. Call me crazy....

I'll consider UHC if/when the US Gov can prove they can spend money responsibly. As in never.
__________________
ICQ: 284903372
drjones is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote