Quote:
Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages
That's not what famous means...
Being well documented doesn't make her famous... I consider someone like Tom Hanks "famous"... Spears is not only the complete opposite, but simply an idiot.. (an ugly one at that in my opnion).
Famous implies someone who is celebrated and widely known based on their positive accomplishments.. someone who is respected (esteemed)
Spears is "infamous" which implies she is well known for an exceedingly bad reputation (ill-famed)
(fame implies that one is widely honored... i doubt Spears is anything close to that.. LOL)
|
Well, what you have said is merely based on your OWN perspective. Believe it or not, Britney does have adult fans who actually enjoy her music. These are mainly people who enjoy pop music and her adult fan base mainly consists of females and gay guys. I know lots of gay guys LOVE Britney's music and lots of women in their 20's do as well.
She's famous as a pop artist and I think she is talented in singing pop music. It's irrelevant that she doesn't write her own music or that her voice is computerized etc, some people STILL like the finished product and she used to be an INCREDIBLE entertainer, perhaps not a GREAT singer (but still a good one) and she was a world class performer with good stage presence and dance movies. I think Britney is a good singer even live, she does have range in some of her songs, she's no Whitney or Mariah, but she can still sing.
That's what she was famous for (way before her breakdown); she was known as the "pop princess" of the world and about to take the reigns from former "pop queen" Madonna.
Before her breakdown Spears was honored as the "pop princess" of the world. Now she has fallen off her high pedestal, but at one time she was on top.