Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_in_Support
The fact that Ron Paul say that "He takes moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name" is really disturbing to me. As a Half Black Man, i don't want your "moral response". So you didnt proofread a newsletter. That is not a moral decision in the least. Do any of the program owners here proofread all the newsletters they they launch to affiliates because of a moral responsibility. No. Its a simple managerial responsibility that causes the top guys to actually take the time to read how they are being represented. I dont want someone for a President who thinks theyll abolish the CFR and Blockade the Hell out of Mexico, by not reading what his speechwriters are drafting for him. Give me a break, and Give me Mike Gravel. I manlove that old fart.
Oh, and you can tell Paul this: I dont want your moral responsibilty. I want a name, give me a name. Give me the name to the guy who wrote black people are welfare cases, and I'll be on my way...
|
Heres an article that was published 6 months ago explaining the situation..
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=41822
And from what I get he was a minority owner of the company publishing the newsletter.. Seems like he put to much trust in his associates..
Btw, the new republic hit piece claimed that the news letters were
filled with racism.. i bet none of you care about seeing proofs of that.. lol