Quote:
Originally Posted by Malicious Biz
Least Federal involvement* He wouldn't care a bit if the states banned porn and wouldn't do a damn thing to stop it. Saying Paul is good for porn is like saying foxes guarding hen houses is a good idea.
|
Thank you for pointing this out. No one seems to see that he would allow the states to decide. Meaning if Alabama doesn't like porn, they can require an ISP to block all porn sites or go after porn sites who are shown to their residents. He would also be against net neutrality which would give the telcos all the power to charge you extra to download streaming video and other things.