GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - GFY Admins: Why Was I Censored? Why Was My Signature Removed?

minusonebit · 01-04-2008, 12:07 AM

Why was I censored?

Why was my signature line on this forum removed and replaced with "Personal Attacks are Against GFY Rules... Strike One!"?

Moreover, which admin did it? If you are going to censor any user on this board for any reason, I think you should at least attach your name to it so everyone knows who did it. No one IMd me before or after and I have no e-mails and no other communication as to who did it or what their reasons were.

How is my linking to various threads on the subject of NATS/TMM - some started by me, some started by others - an act of committing a personal attack in violation of the rules? This is an issue of great importance to alot of people and the signature served as sort of directory to the relevant NATS/TMM threads. Is it now against the rules to encourage or call for the boycott of a shady company?

No one - including me - is challenging the authority of the admins. We're all well aware who is in charge, who owns the sandbox and who gets to make the rules. On the other hand, I will not pretend to agree with what I think is a very unfair decision.

01-04-2008, 12:07 AM
minusonebit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: [email protected] Posts: 7,391	GFY Admins: Why Was I Censored? Why Was My Signature Removed? Why was I censored? Why was my signature line on this forum removed and replaced with "Personal Attacks are Against GFY Rules... Strike One!"? Moreover, which admin did it? If you are going to censor any user on this board for any reason, I think you should at least attach your name to it so everyone knows who did it. No one IMd me before or after and I have no e-mails and no other communication as to who did it or what their reasons were. How is my linking to various threads on the subject of NATS/TMM - some started by me, some started by others - an act of committing a personal attack in violation of the rules? This is an issue of great importance to alot of people and the signature served as sort of directory to the relevant NATS/TMM threads. Is it now against the rules to encourage or call for the boycott of a shady company? No one - including me - is challenging the authority of the admins. We're all well aware who is in charge, who owns the sandbox and who gets to make the rules. On the other hand, I will not pretend to agree with what I think is a very unfair decision.