Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

well i have to admit that post was a bit strange but it was kinda taken out of context.

i think thedoc has been the most polite/straightforward of the nats cheering section. obviously he has some bias , but in general i think he has laid everything out fairly straightforward , perhaps with a bit of spin here and there but i think he has been fair

his point was no software is invulernable , this is true , i think how vulnerabilities are reported is also very important..

on one hand i tend to agree that this sort of thing can happen to anyone , on the other hand this wasnt a "hack" , this should never have happened.

the nats software did not get hacked .. nats got hacked , the software performed exactly how it was supposed to perform with a nats admin logged in. ( i should add only pertaining to the email data that was stolen )