12-28-2007, 11:15 PM
|
|
|
So Fucking Gay
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,714
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spacedog
Says MPA3 made a decision based on the fact that TMM/SegPay is a competitor, so naturally it's sensible to avoid conflict of interest.
|
Right, MPA3 said it made its decision basically in the best interest of ITS company.
Right or wrong (and everyone knows my opinion), there are companies using MPA3 who have decided to utilize Segpay, and now all of a sudden, with something like 30 days notice, they have to up and find a different financial services firm, even though they didn't want to, because MPA3 shut them off from their processor of choice apparently in order to advance its competitive interests against rival software.
That, to me, is a corporation having its core business practices dictated to it by stats software of all things? |
|
|