Quote:
Originally Posted by MicDoohan
You silly old fart. You love attention as much as minusonebit does. If NATS wasn't good software you wouldn't have hundreds of programs using it. Why would any program jump in and defend john if they were paying him money while all their member details were being compromised? Moron.
So far we have VERY little evidence of anything serious from this security breach. No credit cards. No passwords. No 'hundreds of thousands of accounts comprimised'. Some spam emails and thats it. No matter who you do business with in the industry the one thing no one in the biz wants is complete hysteria so no one feels safe joining a paysite.
Are you really this stupid?
|
No one said NATS was not good software so WRONG at the start. It's the people behind it who are to blame.
Why would a sponsor using it want to jump in to defend NATS and John? To keep the traffic flowing. Now who is asking stupid questions.
You have VERY little evidence it was only emails stolen. So WRONG again.
Doctor Dre yes all it took is one retard to let the news out. Much better was the way John handled it. Others might think he should of handled it properly 3 months ago and not deny or hide it. So a retard could show how stupid it was to cover it up.
Seems the "Lets keep the rotten apples hidden" brigade are awake. The problem is of Johns making as I said don't blame the message bearer. blame the person who created the real problem.
But if you're relying on NATS for something it might be better to call me a moron, retard or what ever for pointing out who put us in the shit.