View Single Post
Old 12-23-2007, 06:01 PM  
GigoloMason
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by V_RocKs View Post
And similar laws for 31 other states:
http://www.consumersunion.org/campai...laws_May05.pdf
You should maybe consider reading the law that you posted before spouting off, as for the majority of people none of the data contained in the NATs database falls under the definition laid out in SB-1386.

Not to mention the fact that many programs were not affected by this problem if they had the common sense to lock down their sensitive data\admin passwords properly and\or disable NATs default login. Why would you recieve an email from a program that wasn't compromised?
__________________
GigoloMason is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote